The Crinoid Review
How the review works
The aim of the review is to establish material that is of scientific merit and specimens which are good representatives, possessing public potential for display and community events. These two criteria do not necessarily go hand in hand; as a specimen may have a fantastic scientific research potential, but may not be visually impressive. Therefore the specimens are graded against two separate criteria: Scientific Merit (as a numerical value of stars) and Public Engagement (as a Gold, Silver or Bronze status).
For a more in depth look into the review criteria, click on the “Review Criteria” tab in the tool bar above.
The Crinoid review
The Crinoid collection consists of 13 trays. It was decided that the amount of material would suit the review being conducted as a detailed, systematic, tray by tray investigation, rather than an initial overview of the entire collection, followed by an in depth look at a compiled shortlist.
Day One.
Dr Fiona Fearnhead led the review with some very obvious and truly spectacular specimens jumping out from the start.
The scientific highlight is the historically important holotype of Platycrinites selwoodensis (2 Gold stars – Leedm.B.2009.065.1) and a Dialutocrinus triacondylactilus (1 Gold star – Leedm.B.2009.065.2) both specimens are from Frome in Somerset, UK.
In addition to these specimens, the collection contains some important Ludlow and Wren’s Nest UK SSSI material, with some specimens from historically important collectors; notably associations with Etheldred Benett and the Leeds collector Benjamin Holgate.
The systematic review highlighted a lot of material as having wonderful potential for public engagement with limited scientific merit, notably a Pentacrinus fossilis (0 Gold stars – Leedm.B.2010.127) exhibiting beautifully preserved brachials, pinnules and cirris.
In addition, a Periechocrinties mammiliformis (1 Gold star – Leedm.B.1990.01.4076) exhibiting three calcified zenomorphic stems, illustrating the columnal transition from base to cup. There is also a good example of a Platycrinites sp. (1 Bronze star – Leedm.B.TN5184) being a mass of crinoidal columnars and ossicles on a limestone matrix.
Some interesting material with research potential was discovered, specimens of note are Periechorinus sp. (2 Gold stars – Leedm.B.TN4694) from the Wren’s Nest SSSI site, exhibiting a fine calyx structure and articulated brachials.
Along with a Periechocrinus moliliformis (1 Silver star – Leedm.B.TN1154), featuring crinoidal material on both surfaces of the Wenlock limestone.
Day Two.
The review resumed with some amazing and somewhat surprising discoveries, notably an uncommon holdfast from a Woodocrinus sp. (2 Silver stars – Leedm.B.TN5536), these are often overlook when collecting, and can be a rarity in museum collections. There was also the discovery of numerous Apiocrinus sp. ossicles and complete calyces from the Jurassic, Bradford clay. One of note is the Apiocrinus parkinsoni (0 Bronze stars – Leedm.B.TN1160).
Three other unidentified crinoids specimens of note are: a mass of crinoidal material on a limestone matrix (0 Silver stars – Leedm.B.TN168); a fine plated calyx with articulated delicate brachials and pinnules (2 Silver stars – Leedm.B.TN1148); and a wonderful example, exhibiting fine anatomical details of a proximal columnar (1 Silver star – Leedm.B.TN1161).
Two specimens worthy of a mention but not photographed here are: (1 Clear star – Leedm.B.TN1347) an unidentified crinoid that exhibits a physical response to environmental or parasitic stresses; and a wonderful specimen of Periechocrinites moniliformis (3 Gold stars – Leedm.B.2008.00.006) from the Wren’s Nest SSSI, which is on display in the Life on Earth Gallery at Leeds City Museum.
The review was finally capped off with Fiona enlightening me to the absolutely incredible footage of a crawling extant crinoid… Amazing!
http://palaeo-electronica.org/2007_1/crinoid/fig3.htm
The review covered 178 crinoid specimens, establishing the following summary.
Gold = A truly amazing specimen; Silver = A very good specimen that has great potential; Bronze = A good specimen which can demonstrate a particular feature; Clear = A specimen that has limited visual qualities.
3 stars = High scientific importance. 2 stars = Moderate scientific importance. 1 star = Fair scientific importance. 0 stars = Limited or no scientific importance.
Summary of the Crinoid collection.
Strengths
The collection contains some research possibilities, and has broad examples from a periodic breadth, with many facets of columnals that could warrant future research into stems, with the Silurian material being from key localities of historical significance. There are numerous Apinocrinites specimens which can illustrate calyx and stem articulation within the group, using individual sections, ossicles and cross sections. The abundance of Carboniferous material can easily illustrate size changes and morphology adaptations.
Weaknesses
Sadly the loss of data on some prime specimens diminishes research value, and the unfortunate pyrite decay of a large Lyme Regis specimen.
To close, I would like to say a huge “thank you” to Fiona for reviewing this material and the laughs along the way.
The Crinoids, along with all the other collections are open and free for anyone to view by appointment, just call Leeds Discovery Centre on 0113 378 2100 or email discovery.centre@leeds.gov.uk
The Arthropod Review
How the review works
The aim of the review is to establish material that is of scientific merit and specimens which are good aesthetic representatives, possessing public potential for display and community events. These two criteria do not necessarily go hand in hand; as a specimen may have a fantastic scientific research potential, but may not be visually impressive. Therefore the specimens are graded against two separate criteria: Scientific Merit (as a numerical value of stars) and Public Engagement (as a Gold, Silver or Bronze status).
For a more in depth look into the review criteria, click on the “Review Criteria” tab in the tool bar above.
The Trilobite review
The Arthropod collection consists of 14 trays made up of 9 Trilobites and 5 other Arthropoda (fossil Crustaceans, Insects and a Sea Scorpion cast). It was decided that the amount of material would suit the review being conducted as a detailed, systematic, tray by tray investigation, rather than an initial overview of the entire collection, followed by an in depth look at a compiled shortlist.
Day One.
Dr Joseph Botting led the review, which resulted in some specimens making an impact at the outset. The collection contains some important SSSI material from the Burgess Shale and Wenlock limestone (2 Gold stars – Leedm.B.TN5840).
The scientific highlights are the historically important Bohemian specimens, donated to the museum in 1876 by Dr Antonin Frič, the director of the National Museum Prague. One of these specimens, Miraspis mira (2 Silver stars – Leedm.B.1876.5.2) is quite rare, with distinct spines on the pygidium. The function of these spines is uncertain; but Joe suggested they are likely to be a camouflage feature rather than a defensive structure.
As the review progressed it became apparent that some material has wonderful potential for public engagement. Notably a common specimen Encrinurus punctatus (0 Silver stars – Leedm.B.TN4896), exhibiting interesting lumps on the glabella, which maybe a function of camouflage.
Unfortunately much of this material has little scientific merit, with two wonderful but very common Dalmanites myops specimens (0 Silver stars – Leedm.B.TN4907) and (0 Gold stars – Leedm.B.TN4899); both are fine examples of schizochroal – compound eyes structures.
Some rarer and slightly trickier to find material was discovered in the form of Peronopsis interstricta (2 Gold stars – Leedm.B.TN2015), a planktonic filter feeder from Utah.
Day Two.
The review resumed and revealed some surprising discoveries, notably a Calymene blumenbachi specimen with damaged ribs (2 Gold stars – Leedm.B.TN5586).
On closer inspection it was interpreted as predatory damage from a Sea Scorpion’s pincer. The specimen is the actual trilobite and not a moult, which therefore implies that the trilobite must have survived the initial attack but died within one moult cycle.
Two other Silurian specimens of note are a wonderful example of a Bumastus barriensis (1 Bronze star – Leedm.B.2010.72) an infaunal ambush predator, and another lovely example of Calymene blumenbachi (1 Silver star – Leedm.B.TN5836) exhibiting granular ornamentation on the cephalon.
The review covered 204 trilobite specimens, establishing the following summary.
Gold = A truly amazing specimen; Silver = A very good specimen that has great potential; Bronze = A good specimen which can demonstrate a particular feature; Clear = A specimen that has limited visual impact.
3 stars = High scientific importance.
2 stars = Moderate scientific importance.
1 star = Fair scientific importance.
0 stars = No or limited scientific importance.
With the Trilobite review completed, Joe kindly suggested to review the remaining arthropods; with some wonderful results that would have gone undiscovered.
Review of additional Arthropod material
The highlights of this additional review include a wonderful horseshoe crab Mesolimulus walchi (2 Gold stars – Leedm.B.2010.186) from the Solnhofen limestone.
An additional specimen of Bellinurus trilobitoides (1 Silver star – Leedm.B.2003.01.01) found locally in Leeds.
Similar to the trilobites, the bulk of the collection is of a limited scientific merit, but contains some wonderful material for public engagement, notably a Hoploparia sp. (1 Silver star – Leedm.B.TN4865).
In addition, a wonderful beetle specimen, Cybister explanatus from the La Brea Tar Pits. And last but not least, an interesting and scientifically important bedding plane of crustaceans; exhibiting exceptional soft body preservation from a potential and undescribed Silurian lagerstätten in the UK, both not photographed here.
The additional review of arthropod material covered 85 specimens, establishing the following summary.
Summary of the Trilobite collection.
The collection contains wide ranging material with a lot of fine specimens, but unfortunately lack scientific importance. The collection has not been acquired systematically with donors providing unusual material, with no focus on trilobite sourcing. There is a number of research grade Carboniferous material, featuring a wide range of named species from Malham Tarn and Doncaster.
Strengths
Strong representations of the following groups:
Phacopida group – illustrating eye morphology, life habits and enrolment.
Asaphida group – exhibiting microevolution with species level taxonomy of Trinuclid evolution.
Proetida group – as a conservative group.
Specimens occur as moults and/or complete specimens with compressional and three-dimensional preservation.
The Bohemian material extends the fauna of the collection and adds an impressive element, making these the highlight of the collection along with other non UK specimens from France, Morocco and Utah.
Weaknesses
There are limited specimens from the Lichida, Agnostida and Harpetida groups and no examples from the Eodiscida and Raphophoridae groups.
The Proetida are local Carboniferous, and there are very few specimens from the Scottish side of the Iapetus.
Finally, I would like to thank Joe for this review and all he’s done. It was great fun and a wonderful two days.
The Arthropods, along with all the other collections are open and free for anyone to view by appointment, just call Leeds Discovery Centre on 0113 378 2100 or email discovery.centre@leeds.gov.uk
The Fossil Collection
The fossils make up the majority of the collection and also date back to the founding of Leeds Museum in the 1820’s, encompassing the collections of numerous individuals, notably: Cyril P. Castell, Etheldred Bennett, J.V. Stevens and the recently acquired Leeds collector Earnest E. Gregory.
The result is a vast collection of over 530 trays with approximately 16,000 specimens, covering a vast range of fauna and flora from the local region, the UK, and many sites from around the world.
We have a substantial fossil plant collection of 3,500 specimens from the Carboniferous and Jurassic, which have been extensively studied and cited.
A modest collection of over 1,700 Ammonites and Belemnites, 1,200 Brachiopods, and over 2,000 Bivalves from the local region and further afield. Some impressive wonders of the archives are full skeletons of marine reptiles and Iguanodon bones collected by Edwin Austin.
A dinosaur egg, dinosaur dung from Utah, and large slabs of ripple beds with the preserved archosaur footprints.
Plus a large collection of fossil fish, sharks teeth and vertebrae, including a three dimensionally preserved Coelacanth, Megalichthys and teeth from the ferocious Megalodon shark.
The collection also contains material from numerous cave deposits, notably: Kents Cavern, Raygill Fissure, Windy Knoll, Dawker Bottom, Victoria Cave and Wookey Hole. Featuring numerous mammal skeletal material including a type specimen skull of the extinct Ursus arctos cave bear .
This wealth of fossil material will soon undergo intense scrutiny when the Geoblitz reviews commence in a few weeks time.
The Mineral Collection
The mineral collection dates back to the 1820’s with specimens being donated by the members of the Museums founding Philosophical and Literature Society, as well as generous donations by individuals and collectors associated with the Society. The collection encompasses the notable: Sir Alexander Crichton mineral collection and the Ullyett & Wright collections to name a few.
The result is a substantial collection of 230 trays with approximately 6,600 specimens, too many to list individual specimens or sub-groups; but as an overview, there is a good representation of the following main groups:
Native metals and non-metals, Sulphides, Oxides, Hydroxides, Fluorides, Halides, Carbonates, Nitrates, Borates, Sulphates, Chromates, Phosphates, Silicates and Ore forming minerals.
A wonderful example of Quartz Chalcedony and deatiled below.
Within the collection there are some striking and unsusual specimens that reflect the local region and beyond; with numerous Tektites, Meteorites and a replica of the “Hope diamond“.
The collection will be fully investigated as part of the “Geoblitz” project in the near future and hopefully some undiscovered star specimens will emerge.
You must be logged in to post a comment.